Well, I don’t really use Skype unless I’m talking to you guys, so I haven’t really tested it since then. From what I remember recording, it only happened for a small portion of the recording.
My reasoning is this: we need to find a way to improve the audio quality by a lot and I feel that by using different programs, we’ll be able to see what works and what doesn’t. We’ve tried Kyle’s program and now we should try something else to see if there is an improvement. If not, we can go back to Kyle for the recording. It would help cut the editing time of the podcast if the audio quality was up to snuff. For example, Neil’s voice on the first episode was perfect while everyone else’s was very low, although I know it was late at night and you guys didn’t want to wake anyone up so that might have had something to do with it. ![]()
Another thing that is a problem is the dropped calls. That has to do with the bandwidth of all the people involved. The person hosting the podcast (as in, inviting everyone to the recording) has to have high bandwidth.
Something (perhaps slightly controversial) that I am going to say is that I do think that future podcasts should be a little bit shorter in length than the last one - that’s purely my personal opinion, but I would say that, apart from Masterscast, all the other podcasts I’ve downloaded have all been 25 minutes at the most. I’m not suggesting for a second that we should aim to be that short, but if we could maybe try and aim for 50 - 60 minutes’ worth of content? What do you guys think?
I agree. 30-45 minutes is usually the best time frame, but an hour should be the max.