Fans of the Marvel movies will enjoy this. ![]()
http://www.pokies.net.au/marvel-costumes/img/infographic.png
Thatās pretty cool.
Shouldnāt the second one along for the Hulk be āThe Incredible Hulkā?
I noticed that too. The āHulkā was the first solo movie of the character starring Eric Bana. The second one āThe Incredible Hulkā was the one with Ed Norton. Officially I donāt think either of those two movies are considered part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), despite the second movie sharing some continuity with āThe Avengersā.
The second Hulk movie āāThe Incredible Hulkāā does have the post credit scene so it is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
In the Captain America movie, the outfit he wears when entertaining the troops/public appearance is the same as fist first comic appearance outfit.
I didnāt know that. I checked and you are right. It is indeed part of MCU. :thumbsup But somehow it just feels rather disconnected from the whole MCU. Apart from William Hurt in āCaptain America Civil Warā, I donāt recall any other actors from TIH appearing in the other MCU movies.
Nor can I. It really is over looked mostly because Iron Man came out at the same time and was critically and financially better received and with Norton not reprising the Bruce Banner role for Avengers.
I think that just may be it. Not only didnāt the movie achieve great success, but the change of actors also affects how we perceive the continuity. Personally I prefer Ruffalo over Norton or Bana.
The deleted openening is referenced in The Avengers, when Bruce says he put a gun in his mouth and the other guy spat out a bullet. The fight with Abomination that takes place in Harlem is mentioned in Luke Cage also.
Ruffalo is definitely the best. It would be interesting to see him in a stand alone movie. Although the one problem Hulk has compared to all the others is that he is pretty big shoes to fill as any live action Hulk will always be compared to the Bill Bixby/Lou Ferringo TV series.
I didnāt know about that deleted opening. Might have ended up being better than the one they used.
I havenāt seen āLuke Cageā, is it any good?
The 1970s TV series is my absolute favorite! :thumbsup Which is why I like Ruffalo as he is the closest in performance to the late Bixby. I personally feel that Marvel didnāt handle the Hulk properly. They made the same mistake with the character that DC are doing with their characters, trying to cram too much into one movie. The first Hulk movie (or any superhero origin movie), should be simple and to the point. Donāt try to put too much in it, whether itās CGI or villains.
The TV Series pilot introduced the Hulk pretty much perfectly. The story was simple and about Banner. There werenāt any weird or āover-the-topā elements in it. A viewer could very easily identify with Bannerās character, his motivations. That is one of the main reasons why the first āIron Manā movie also worked. If it had Warm Machine and the Mandarin, and Killian and Extremis in it, it would have been too much. The golden rule for origin movies? KISS (Keep It Simple Snyder!) ![]()
Apparently itās the reason why Norton had a big falling out over the movie. Lots of it was cut out and shortened, and he was unhappy about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwrkR3PELJ8
Luke Cage is very good. Not as good as Daredevil for me, but still a great show, definitely worth a watch.
At least Ruffalo is now somewhat established as the Hulk thanks to those Avengers movies so maybe another stand alone movie for the Hulk could do quite well. They donāt have to re-tread old ground with origin stories and trying to cram everything in again.
Thanks for that video link! Looks quite interesting, but it doesnāt show Banner actually shooting himself. The moment he holds the gun he transforms.
Yes, I have heard that Norton has a tendency to get quite āinvolvedā with his movies. Thatās something Marvel probably donāt like. ![]()
There are so many shows that I want to watch, just canāt seem to make the time. So far Iāve only been able to watch most of āAgents of SHIELDā and āAgent Carterā. Enjoyed both tremendously! ![]()
It is a possibility, even though a remote one. I guess first weāll have to see how āThor Ragnarokā and the two āAvengersā movies turn out and what happens to his character. Iām guessing that by that time some of the actors (Chris Evans, RDJ, Hemsworth) will have completed their contract and also might not want to return back to their roles. Maybe Marvel will pass their torch onto some new blood? In the comics thereās always been plenty of Captain Americas. :biggrin
I keep meaning to watch Agents Carts and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
If what I have heard of Ragnarok, the comic, is true then Chris Hemsworthās Thor could be having a break from the movies for a while.
But itās Disney so like Civil War they probably wonāt copy the comic ending too much.
I guess the opening scene with Norton putting a gun in his mouth might have been too much, but Ruffalo is definitely alluding to the scene in Avengers. You canāt see it at such low res, but at the end when the ice breaks, there are a few frames of Captain America in there. This is obviously before they wrote him being in the ice within the ship they found him in.
Agents of Shield is a mixed bag of quality, there have been some good episodes though and Iām liking this season so far. I thought the first season of Agent Carter was really great. I didnāt care for the second season at all though. They should have focused on the creation of SHEILD instead of where they went with it.
I agree. There were some bad episodes. And also the series doesnāt really take off until after the first couple of episodes, which makes the pilot kinda boring. Another thing that always bugged me about the show was it focused too much on Daisy. Itās like the whole world revolved around her. Many of the other interesting characters were sidelined so that the spotlight can be firmly on her.